Across companies and public organisations, a growing sense of quiet frustration is becoming increasingly common. Employees log into sophisticated digital systems every day, follow automated workflows, complete required steps, and yet often feel that these tools slow them down rather than help them. This frustration matters more than it seems. When people stop believing that workplace software is useful, productivity suffers, stress increases, and even the quality of services offered to customers can deteriorate.
This is particularly true for Business Process Management Systems (BPMS). These systems are designed to organise, automate, and monitor how work is carried out across an organisation, from handling customer requests to processing administrative procedures. In theory, BPMS should make work clearer, faster and more reliable. In practice, their success depends less on technical sophistication than on something much more human: how useful employees believe them to be.
Recent research based on real users of BPMS in commercial organisations shows that user perception is not a side issue. It is the key factor that determines whether these systems actually deliver value.
What makes employees see business software as useful?
The study analysed how employees evaluate BPMS once these systems have been in use for several years. This is an important distinction. Many digital projects are assessed during implementation, when novelty and expectations still dominate. But daily reality is shaped by long-term use.
Employees tend to see BPMS as useful when three conditions are met: the information produced by the system is reliable and meaningful, the system itself works smoothly, and users feel supported rather than abandoned.
Interestingly, simply using the system more often does not automatically increase perceived usefulness. Spending many hours interacting with software does not guarantee that people value it. In fact, frequent users may become more critical when systems are poorly designed or badly supported. This finding challenges a widespread assumption in digital transformation strategies: that usage equals success. In reality, forced use without perceived value often leads to disengagement, not acceptance.
Information quality: The strongest driver of usefulness
Among all factors analysed, one stands out above the rest: the quality of information and knowledge generated by the system.
Employees value BPMS when the information they retrieve is accurate, up to date, easy to understand and directly relevant to their tasks. When systems provide confusing screens, incomplete data or poorly structured content, users quickly lose trust. Once trust is lost, the system becomes a burden rather than a support tool.
This has important social implications. Poor information quality increases cognitive load, contributes to work-related stress, and reduces employees’ sense of control. In sectors such as public administration, it can also affect citizens indirectly, through slower responses, errors or inconsistent decisions.
A system that works is not optional, it is essential
The second major factor influencing perceived usefulness is system quality. Employees expect BPMS to be reliable, responsive, and well-integrated with other tools such as email, spreadsheets, or document editors.
When systems crash, respond slowly or require constant workarounds, frustration accumulates. Over time, employees stop seeing the system as a tool that supports their work and begin to see it as an obstacle they must overcome.
This finding may seem obvious, but it is often underestimated in decision-making. Organisations sometimes prioritise advanced features over stability, or underestimate the long-term impact of minor usability problems. The research shows that basic operational quality is a prerequisite for any perceived benefit.
Why training and support matter more than expected
One of the most practical insights from the study concerns service quality, particularly in terms of training and user support. Employees are far more likely to value BPMS when they feel properly trained and know that help is available when problems arise.
Training is not just about learning how to click through screens. It helps users understand what the system can do, why certain steps exist, and how the tool fits into the broader organisational process. Support, meanwhile, signals that the organisation cares about how employees experience technology.
From a societal perspective, this has wider implications. Poorly supported digitalisation can deepen inequalities within organisations, benefiting only highly skilled users while leaving others behind. Effective training and support reduce this gap and contribute to fairer, more inclusive workplaces.
Data entry: The hidden foundation of digital success
Another important but often overlooked factor is the quality of input. Employees are more likely to perceive BPMS as useful when entering data is straightforward, flexible, and well supported.
If users struggle to input information correctly or cannot easily correct mistakes, the entire system suffers as a result. Poor input leads to poor outputs, undermining trust in reports, dashboards, and automated decisions. This insight is particularly relevant for public organisations and regulated sectors, where data quality has legal and ethical implications. Investing in better data entry design is not a technical detail; it is a strategic decision with real consequences for accountability and transparency.
Implications for companies and public policy
Investing in BPMS is not just about buying software. It requires sustained attention to information quality, system reliability, user training and everyday usability. Without this, digital transformation risks becoming an expensive source of frustration.
For public policymakers, the findings are equally relevant. As governments increasingly rely on digital systems to deliver services, the citizen experience depends indirectly on how public employees interact with these tools. Poorly designed or poorly supported systems can translate into slower services, lower trust, and weaker institutional performance.
Policies that promote digitalisation should therefore go beyond adoption targets. They should emphasise human-centred design, continuous training, and long-term system quality, especially in public administration.
Digital transformation starts with people
BPMS are often presented as neutral technologies that automatically improve efficiency. But they are anything but neutral. Their success depends on how people experience them in everyday work.
When employees believe that systems help them perform their jobs more effectively, everyone benefits: organisations perform more efficiently, workplaces become less stressful, and customers and citizens receive better services. When that belief disappears, even the most advanced technology can fail.
Digital transformation, ultimately, is not about systems. It is about people.
🔬🧫🧪🔍🤓👩🔬🦠🔭📚
Referensi jurnal
Navarro, A. M. M., Sancho, M. P. L., Szelągowski, M., & Medina-Garrido, J. A. (2025). Is User Perception the Key to Unlocking the Full Potential of Business Process Management Systems (BPMS)? Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 37(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.364099
